Perceptual Process in the Case



Selection

  1. Arjun noticed only the risk of displeasing the client and his own pressure from senior management. He filtered out Riya’s earlier good performance and the advance approval of leave.
  2. Riya focused on the last-minute change and the threatening tone, not on the external client pressure faced by her manager.

Organisation

  1. Arjun grouped Riya’s behaviour with prior experiences of “uncooperative juniors,” mentally placing her in a category of low-flexibility employees.
  2. Riya organised the experience as another example of “managers not valuing work–life balance,” linking it with stories from colleagues.

Interpretation (with Errors)

  1. Arjun showed stereotyping (“young employees these days avoid responsibility”) and projection (assuming she valued client relationships exactly as he did).
  2. Riya showed halo/negative halo, letting this one incident eclipse her earlier positive view of the manager, and selective perception, focusing only on disrespect and not on constraints.

Response and Outcome

  1. Arjun threatened negative career consequences if she did not reschedule, which Riya experienced as bullying and a violation of the psychological contract.
  2. Riya complied outwardly but became disengaged, started exploring job options, and shared her story with colleagues, damaging trust and morale in the team.