Phase: Planning | Audience: Internal | Project: WEB-2026-01 Corporate Website Development
In simple words: The Risk Register lists things that might go wrong, how likely and how serious they are, what we will do about them, who owns them and how much money is kept aside.
Think of it like: Before an outdoor wedding you note: 'rain is possible, so book a tent'. The risk is rain; the response is the tent; the cost of the tent is your reserve.
When is it created? | Planning, reviewed every Monday |
Who prepares it? | Project Manager with risk owners |
Who approves or uses it? | Internal; top risks reported to sponsor |
What happens next? | Risks that happen move to the Issue Log |
Below is the actual document for project WEB-2026-01. Read the purpose first, then go through each numbered section.
Issued by: [Your Company] Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Purpose: Identified risks with probability, impact, response and owner. Reviewed every Monday. Scores use a 1–5 scale; score = probability × impact.
Item | Detail |
Document no. | WEB-2026-01/RR |
Version | 1.3 |
Date | 30 Oct 2026 |
Owner | Project Manager |
Audience | Internal |
Phase | Planning |
ID | Risk (cause → effect) | P | I | Score | Response | Action | Owner | Reserve (₹) | Status |
R1 | Client requests a third design round → design effort and schedule overrun | 3 | 3 | 9 | Mitigate | Show designs to MD before sign-off; bill extra rounds via rate card | Designer | 14,000 | Open |
R2 | CMS or form integration problems → extra backend effort | 2 | 4 | 8 | Mitigate | Build and test form in week 4 on staging | Backend | 12,750 | Open |
R3 | Client content arrives late → developers idle, launch at risk | 4 | 3 | 12 | Mitigate | Content calendar; weekly reminder; use placeholder text to keep building | PM | 11,000 | Open |
R4 | Licence or hosting prices rise → higher non-labour cost | 2 | 2 | 4 | Accept | Buy annual licences at start | PM | 8,050 | Closed |
R5 | Diwali week reduces capacity → schedule slip | 3 | 2 | 6 | Avoid | Plan 60% capacity in week 6 | PM | 0 | Monitoring |
R6 | Key developer unavailable → development delay | 2 | 4 | 8 | Mitigate | Code in Git; backup developer identified | Delivery Head | 0 | Open |
R7 | Client pays late → cash gap in month 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | Mitigate | Invoice on sign-off day; payment terms in SOW | PM | 0 | Open |
R8 | Informal requests via chat → scope creep | 4 | 3 | 12 | Avoid | All requests through change request form | PM | 0 | Open |
R9 | Delayed DNS or domain access → go-live delay | 3 | 3 | 9 | Mitigate | Access requested in week 1; test DNS change in week 9 | Backend | 0 | Open |
R10 | Performance target missed → quality criterion fails | 2 | 3 | 6 | Mitigate | Image compression and caching from the start | Frontend | 0 | Open |
Total contingency reserve | 45,800 |
Score | Rating | Action |
12–25 | High | Weekly action; report to sponsor |
6–11 | Amber | Monitor weekly; response plan ready |
1–5 | Green | Review monthly |
Note: Update on 30 Oct: R1 partly happened (home design needed extra rework, logged as issue I-03). R4 closed after licences were bought at the quoted price.
WEB-2026-01/RR · v1.3 · Internal. Bracketed items such as [Client Name] are placeholders.
Next lesson: 21. Quality and Test Plan